{"id":82987,"date":"2026-05-18T18:40:55","date_gmt":"2026-05-18T22:40:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/columns\/general\/punjab-notes-dr-faqir-retrieving-the-classical-texts\/"},"modified":"2026-05-18T18:40:55","modified_gmt":"2026-05-18T22:40:55","slug":"punjab-notes-dr-faqir-retrieving-the-classical-texts","status":"publish","type":"columns","link":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/columns\/mushtaq-soofi\/punjab-notes-dr-faqir-retrieving-the-classical-texts\/","title":{"rendered":"PUNJAB NOTES: Dr Faqir: retrieving the classical texts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"center\">\n<img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" src=\"\/columns\/mushtaq-soofi\/2016\/mushtaq-soofi.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" src=\"\/columns\/mushtaq-soofi\/2016\/name-final.gif\" width=\"284\" height=\"36\"><\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"2\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse\" width=\"700\" id=\"AutoNumber1\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<div>\n        <b><i><span>The Dawn: June 10, 2016<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p class=\"style2\">\n<h1 align=\"center\">PUNJAB NOTES: Dr Faqir: retrieving the classical texts<\/h1>\n<h1 align=\"center\"><span>Mushtaq Soofi<\/span>&nbsp;<\/h1>\n<p align=\"center\">\n        <\/div>\n<p>Immediately after the  emergence of Pakistan as a state that was based on the notion of Muslim  separatism, it was difficult as well as dangerous to uphold views which in any  way, directly or indirectly, recognised the historical fact that society in the  territories of Pakistan was ancient and diverse. The fact of its being ancient  and diverse militated against the politico-ideological construct of faith-based  exclusivity. Being ancient showed that society with the passage of time  continued to change its faith and religious practices. Being diverse meant that  no single principle could work as social glue to hold it together. Such a  historical reality was hard to deny but nevertheless it was loudly denied by  the state and the elite. The Harappa civilisation was brushed under the carpet  in order to hide our Dravidian roots. Rig-Veda, composed in Punjab by mainly  Aryan Rishis (seers), was rejected because it showed our forebears as upholders  of variegated strands of Hindu culture. Jainism and Buddhism were conveniently  ignored which told us, once our forefathers practiced these faiths that  debunked Brahmanism and produced the glorious Gandhara culture that spread over  large areas of Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. <\/p>\n<p>Such an untenable project  initiated by Muhajir (Urdu speaking) bureaucracy in collusion with the Punjabi  political elite was an outcome of denialism; it denied what was undeniable and  reaffirmed what could not be affirmed. They should have been charged with  defacing the nation in the name of raising it! <\/p>\n<p>Punjab, the cradle of  sub-continental civilisation, was deliberately reduced to a cultural and  intellectual cesspool. In the decades that followed the Partition, it was  literally a criminal offence to talk of Punjab&rsquo;s language, literature and  culture. The state considered reading, writing and promoting Punjabi language a  conspiracy against Pakistan, a threat to ill-conceived notion of national  unity. <\/p>\n<p>In such hostile  conditions a few individuals such as Ustad Daman, Maula Baksh Kushta, Joshua  Fazal Din and Dr Faqir Muhammad Faqir mounted the literary stage without  panoply and asserted the linguistic rights of the people of the Punjab not  through callow sloganeering but through their concrete work. <\/p>\n<p>Advertisement<\/p>\n<p>Ustad Daman being man of  the people was an exception. He was a born rebel who appeared larger than life.  He always had the courage to challenge in public and private the dictates of  General Ayub Khan, Z A Bhutto and General Ziaul Haq. He through his poetry and  personal acts defied tyranny and suffered with stoic patience.<\/p>\n<p>Dr Faqir (1900-1974) was  a man of letters. He was passionately in love with Punjabi, his mother tongue  and was rightly proud of its glorious literary tradition spanning over  centuries. He was a poet, writer, researcher and above all an indefatigable  collector of manuscripts and literary editor. He found a friend in a well-known  scholar and teacher Dr Muhammad Baqir who being principal of Oriental College,  University of the Punjab, had some clout with officialdom. Dr Baqir supported  him in his literary endeavours. Dr Faqir was greatly worried about the literary  heritage which was disappearing fast from the Punjab&rsquo;s cultural landscape due  to official negligence and societal indifference born of inherited colonial  state policy regarding the Punjabi language. He set himself the task of  retrieving manuscripts of classical writings which were gathering dust in the  dark recesses of private libraries. What he retrieved was nothing less than  remarkable. It was result of his overriding literary passion and hard work that  made Dr Faqir a must figure in the history of modern Punjabi literature. He  collected and edited the work of Bulleh Shah which still stands out as standard  text. He travelled far and wide to find a reliable version of Hafiz  Barkhurdar&rsquo;s inimitable tale of Mirza Sahiban. He consulted different  manuscripts and painstakingly evolved a text that carried an imprint of its  being authentic because of internal and external evidence. It was a much  greater gift than the fragments of Pilu&rsquo;s Mirza Sahiban collected by  R.C.Temple. It was no mean feat to have found the complete tale of great  literary value which was likely to be lost to posterity. He compiled and  published another stimulating book of poetry composed by intellectually  inclined Hasham Shah titled &ldquo;Kukaaray&rdquo;. He brought out &ldquo;Bol Faridi&rdquo;, the  couplets of Baba Farid, the first great classical poet of contemporary Punjabi.  He also published Heer Wais Shah along with scores of lesser known poets. Post  partition he was the first to regularly bring out literary monthly &ldquo;Punjabi&rdquo;  from 1951 to 1960.<\/p>\n<p>Dr Faqir&rsquo;s contribution  in retrieving classical texts is laudable. In recognition of his literary and  scholarly contribution, Dr Mujahid Kamran, the vice chancellor of the  University of Punjab, created Dr Faqir research chair at the Department of  Punjabi, Oriental College, in 2013. Junaid Akram, a known poet and writer, and  Secretary of Bazm-i-Faqir, Pakistan, was appointed as a research scholar who produced  numerous research articles and two books on Dr Faqir&rsquo;s life and work &#8212; &ldquo;Faqir  Namay&rdquo; (Dr Faqir&rsquo;s correspondence with literary figures) and &ldquo;Saadi Daak&rdquo; (a  selection of letters to the editor of the magazine &lsquo;Punjabi&rsquo;) &#8212; which hints at  the trajectory of literary struggle in the early years of Pakistan. Let&rsquo;s hope  the Department of Punjabi, Oriental College, will continue to encourage  scholars to produce research and scholarly work which is the rasion d&rsquo;etre of  its existence. One expects nothing less than quality research from its current  chairman Dr Saeed Bhutta who himself is a serious researcher and scholar of  repute.<\/p>\n<p>Setting up of Dr Faqir  Chair and naming of a Government College in Gujranwala after him acknowledge,  though belatedly, the contribution made by this committed scholar. As a maven  of classical texts he succeeded in preserving some of the highly significant  but neglected classical literary texts for the coming generations. This earned  him an enviable place in the cultural history of the Punjab. &mdash;  soofi01@hotmail.com<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p align=\"center\"><b><span><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.apnaorg.com\">BACK TO APNA WEB PAGE<\/a><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Dawn: June 10, 2016 PUNJAB NOTES: Dr Faqir: retrieving the classical texts Mushtaq Soofi&nbsp; Immediately after the emergence of Pakistan as a state that was based on the notion of Muslim separatism, it was difficult as well as dangerous to uphold views which in any way, directly or indirectly, recognised the historical fact that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","columnist":[4079],"class_list":["post-82987","columns","type-columns","status-publish","hentry","columnist-mushtaq-soofi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/columns\/82987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/columns"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/columns"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"columnist","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/columnist?post=82987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}