{"id":70443,"date":"2026-02-10T21:24:58","date_gmt":"2026-02-11T02:24:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/articles\/issues-and-facts-about-ncert-books\/"},"modified":"2026-02-28T17:13:00","modified_gmt":"2026-02-28T22:13:00","slug":"issues-and-facts-about-ncert-books","status":"publish","type":"articles","link":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/articles\/issues-and-facts-about-ncert-books\/","title":{"rendered":"Issues and Facts about NCERT Books"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"left\"><strong>By Chaman Lal<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Date:<em>06-09-06<\/em><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Source: <em>APNA<\/em><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">A lot of heat was  generated in Rajya Sabha on the issue of allegedly objectionable material in  NCERT Hindi and History books, being taught to students. MP&rsquo;s cutting across  party lines went on to the extent of seeking punishment to the scholars  responsible for recommending this material. &nbsp;&nbsp;It is  very interesting that BJP , who had been after the head of left wing  historians, since more than a quarter &nbsp;century, wittingly or unwittingly, got the  support from the left itself. That too, just a week or so after, they had been  seeking the head of Speaker of Lok Sabha, not because of any genuine reason,  but &nbsp;only for being a left nominee to the  post.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        Is there any solid logic behind  the den being raised by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad, &nbsp;who was supported by MP&rsquo;s from Congress,  SP,CPM and RSP? What are the facts of the case? There are multiple issues  involved in this debate, if conducted seriously. First of all, the competence  question. Who can give more sound and solid opinion on issues relating to  education and pedagogy? MP&rsquo;s are no doubt elected by the people(Though not in  Rajya Sabha) and they have a right to make laws and question Govt. policies in  any area of governance. My humble question here is just this&mdash;Even if one has  certain rights granted under constitution, are these rights to be exercised in  an enlightened and knowledgeable manner or just as per one&rsquo;s political agenda  and convenience? Do all &nbsp;our MP&rsquo;s have knowledge  about each and everything of India,  about which they are supposed to speak in Parliament? And do they speak about  each and everything about which they should have been speaking in Parliament?  Facts do not support either of the contention. Not to talk of our MP&rsquo;s, none in  the world, be it Amartya Sen or George Bush, can claim to have knowledge of  each and everything about the world? Amartya Sen like people have the humility  to acknowledge this obvious fact, whereas George Bush like people destroy the  world by their cooked up &lsquo;knowledge&rsquo;, be in Iraq  or in West Asia. If cooked up knowledge is too  dangerous for the world, &lsquo;half-baked&rsquo; information is equally disastrous.  Unfortunately, the whole controversy about NCERT books, not only this time,  from the very beginning, is based upon half baked informations, often quoted  out of context, resulting in social tensions. This is particularly true of  History books, authored by Bipan Chandra or Satish Chandra. The comments about  Guru Gobind Singh, Guru Teg Bahadur or Jats etc. or calling Tilak ,Pal or  Aurbindo as terrorists, which are always ascribed to the authors of these  books, are never their comments. Bipan Chandra and Satish Chandra like eminent  nationalist historians can never distort history like that. They have discussed  the comments made by either colonial historians or communal historians and  contradicted and condemned these unfounded comments about our great national  heroes with facts and reason. It has again been repeated in Rajya Sabha that  Tilak, Aurbindo, Bipan Chander Pal ,Lala Lajpat Rai like nationalist figures  have been characterized as terrorists in NCERT history book written by Bipan  Chandra. This is factually wrong. In text book &lsquo;Modern India&rsquo; for class  xii,edition 1994,in a chapter Nationalist Movement(1905-18),Bipan Chandra has  written-&lsquo;The most outstanding leaders of militant nationalism apart from  Lokmanya Tilak, were Bipin Chandra Pal,Aurbindo Ghosh, and Lala Lajpat Rai.The  distinctive political aspects of the programme of the militant nationalist were  as follows.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        They believed that Indians  themselves must work out their own salvation and make the effort to rise from  their degraded position. They declared that great sacrifices and sufferings  were needed for this task. Their speeches, writings and political work were  full of boldness and self-confidence and they considered no personal sacrifice  too great for the good of their country.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        Xxx They had deep faith in the  strength of the masses and they planned to achieve swaraj through mass action. They  ,therefore, pressed for political work among masses and for direct political  action by the masses.&rdquo;(Pages 192-3)<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        Nowhere Bipan Chandra used  the word terrorist for these nationalist figures, which has been ascribed to  him, whether intentionally or by lack of correct information. Since in BJP like  parties, reason has no place, so the distortions&nbsp; are rather made at their end to whip up  communal passions.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        Does BJP knows that first lesson in  nationalism to Indians was taught by Karl Marx himself, while writing about  1857, as war of independence, full fifty years before Veer Savarkar wrote it as  first war of Independence and has BJP , an iota of respect for Karl Marx for  this historical interpretation of 1857, which is called Ghadar by British  colonial historians?<BR><br \/>\n        So much for the history books, let  us now turn Hindi books for facts.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        Four or five objections have  been raised about Hindi books by NCERT ,prescribed for class XI.One is about  the use of unconstitutional words in the stories or poems of prescribed  writers. One such word is &lsquo;Bhangi&rsquo; used by Prem Chand in his story&rsquo;Doodh ka  Daam&rsquo;Another such example has been quoted from an eminent Dalit writer Om  Prakash Valmiki&rsquo;s story.Another objection is that why M.F. Hussain&rsquo;s  biographical chapter has been included in the book. Not that something is  objectionable in the chapter, but the very name of M.F. Hussain is like red rag  to the bull for some sections, though he might be an artist of international  recognition. Foreign Universities, colleges or schools might discuss his works,  we will not allow his name to be known to our students, this is the approach. One  more objection is to the use of certain words in the Sahitya Akademi award  winner poet Dhumil&rsquo;s poem &lsquo;Mochi Ram&rsquo; .Yet another objection is to the  introduction of Paash, an eminent Panjabi poet, because he is a &ldquo;Naxalite. &rsquo;Even  the writer respected by Mahatma Gandhi, Pandey Bechan Sharma Ugar is not spared  by this virulent and totally irrational attack.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        Earlier also a novel&nbsp; Rangbhoomi by Prem Chand was burnt by Bhartiya  Dalit Sahitya Akademi and forced to be withdrawn from course of NCERT, because  it has word &lsquo;Chamar&rsquo; in the text.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        One wonders sometimes the laws  made by our law-makers. The spirit behind ban on such word is that in social  interaction sometimes, lower classes are subjected to insults and humiliating behavior  by upper and powerful classes by using these wo, in this context a ban on use  of such words is justified. But in census, in collecting social data, in  sociological studies, in creative literature, how can the use of these words &nbsp;be subjected to a blanket ban ?In legal terms  also, in matters of reservations, how the castes would not be counted, written  and put on record for granting the benefits of reservation or in such contexts.  These words would be found in the works of Tagore, Prem Chand or other great  writers. Would these writers be subjected to scrutiny, in other words censorship,  to remove these words from their texts? Our law makers should ponder over these  larger issues.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n        Paash is one of the major  Panjabi poets, whose works are part of syllabuses of all Universities,  colleges, teaching Panjabi literature, it is part of UPSC syllabus as well.  Paash&rsquo;s works have been translated into major lndian languages  Bengali,Gujrati,Marathi, Telugu, Malyalm , Hindi etc. UGC , in its model course  designed during NDA rule has recommended teaching Paash as one major Indian poet.  His poetry has been compared to poetry of poets like Neruda. And Paash was  murdered at the hands of Khalistani terrorists for confronting them directly  through his poetry. A library, in the memory of slain policemen of Haryana, at  the hands of Khalistanis, has been named as Paash library, established by  Police deptt. itself.Yet our BJP MP can see only a &lsquo;Naxalite&rsquo; in him!Paash in  one of his poems have referred to&rsquo; the critics with red turbans&rsquo;, had he  listened to the interpretation of his poetry in Rajya Sabha, what term he would  have coined for such literary critics. Perhaps poets alive will surely find a  suitable term for&nbsp; such critics, provided  they are not too scared to be jailed for contempt of&nbsp; Parliament!&nbsp;  Sahitya Akademi award winner Hindi poet Dhumil already has a word coined  for such critics , in one of his other poems, which I myself am too scared to  quote here.<BR><br \/>\n        <BR><br \/>\n    The issues in the field of  education should be subjected to enlightened debates, based on facts and texts  discussed in their proper context. Any out of context quotation from the text  books and a narrow and sectarian approach, will harm our younger generations  only, which needs to be given most liberal and advanced education. In the words  of Jawaharlal Nehru, our youth need scientific temper. True, perhaps our  Parliamentarians need it even more!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":70444,"template":"","language":[],"class_list":["post-70443","articles","type-articles","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles\/70443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/articles"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/70444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apnaorg.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=70443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}