The Dawn: March 16, 2018

PUNJAB NOTES: Punjab resisted invaders from North, South and East (Part-II)

Mushtaq Soofi 

Our friends from the South [Sindh] try to stigmatise Punjab for showing lack of will to repulse the foreign invaders and passively accept their dominance. They like our Pashtun friends forget history as their nationalist view is conditioned more by current political exigencies than historical consciousness.

Punjab faced one major invasion from the South that transformed its socio-religious and politico-cultural landscapes; the Arab invasion. This in fact was an extension of Arab invasion of Sindh. After endless deliberations and meticulous planning, the Arab armies launched their relentless assaults on Sindh. The expedition was neither the first one nor the faith-driven as is made out in our textbooks. This in fact was the third attempt under young Umayyad general Muhammad Bin Qasim who happened to be son-in-law of Hajaj, the governor of Iraq. His army invaded Sindh in 712 A.D. By this time the Arabs had built a vast empire that included countries such as Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, parts of Central Asia and present-day Afghanistan [Arabs captured Herat populated by Buddhists in 652].

Empire by its very nature has its own dynamics; it must expand or stagnate and eventually disintegrate as a result of an enervating policy underpinned by hewing and hawing. An empire without insatiable lust for expansion becomes vapid and unsustainable. Arab empire was no exception. It was steadily pushing its boundaries eastward and westward with its armies fired by the pooled energy of newly found confederacy of Arab tribes and the faith that unified disparate peoples.

Raja Dahir obviously fought the invading army but lost. Thus Sindh became ‘Babul Islam’ [the Gateway of Islam] in the Indian subcontinent. Without going into reasons for the invasion, one can say to our Sindhi friends of nationalist persuasion: Had you stopped the Arab tide at your shores, it would not have touched the upland plains of Punjab. It was Sindh that paved the way for the partial Arab conquest of Punjab. The second wave that swept Punjab came gushing from the North with a snowball effect. Central Asian Turks from the 10th century onwards occupied Pashtun region and subjugated its people before entering the present-day Punjab. Pathan tribes which take great pride in their military prowess couldn’t stop predatory Turks in their tracks. They need to pause and ponder before accusing Punjab of being more acquiescent in the context of the past invasions. Our literature and folklore are replete with references to the resistance put up by various segments of Punjab’s society. Baba Guru Nanak wrote a scathing criticism and loud condemnation of Babar’s invasion titled ‘Babar Bani’ which very explicitly portrays the atrocities committed by Babar’s troops against Hindus and Muslims, especially the women irrespective of faith. Babar’s unbridled troops mass-raped ‘Hinduwanis [Hindu women]’ and ‘Trukanis [Muslim women]’.

Article continues after ad

Poet Nijabat composed the most celebrated epic of our literature ‘Nijabat di Var aka Nadir Shah di Var’ which exposed Nadir’s barbarity as well as the shenanigans of quislings. About the Nizam of Deccan, the collaborator, Nijabat says: ‘May this Nizam’s very roots dry out / He lit the candle to show a thief the house’. So pervasive was resentment that Ra Bhobat, the head of a school of ascetics, urged his followers to defend the homeland: “Ra Bhobat roused all his colleagues to take the challenge/ The life in the world lasts for a day or two/How long will you live?/ all of you are audacious musclemen/ so you all go down fighting”. Another classical poet Ali Haidar from Khanewal named and shamed ‘Toorani’ and ‘Irani’ factions of the Mughal court for not defending the country. Ahmed Shah Abdali’s invasion proved to be a disaster both for the Mughal and Afghan as in its aftermath the peasantry rose in rebellion and wiped out the vestiges of foreign rule from Punjab.

The last great invasion against Punjab came from the East i.e. from the Indian territories occupied by the ruthless East India Company which was an epitome of extremely coercive early colonial rule in the subcontinent. Maharaja Ranjit Singh, an astute politician and sharp military mind, jealously guarded his large kingdom against any possible intrusion by the company. Sensing the colonial game, he refused to give passage to the company’s troops in its effort to attack Afghanistan. The same facility was provided by Sindh and the princely state of Bahawalpur which were already in the talons of colonial administration. Chaos, internal strife, assignations and palace intrigues followed the death of Maharaja in 1839 as none in the line had the vision, wisdom and authority to ably succeed him. Despite all the blinding clouds of political dust raised by opposing factions and interest groups in a sanguinary power struggle, the company in addition to creating internal rifts at Lahore Darbar had to fight wars [known as Anglo-Sikh Wars] against the formidable modernised Punjab army. Poet Shah Mohammad in his Var ‘Jang Hind Punjab’ exposes the role played by the regime due to internal bickering that was one of the major causes of defeat of its army in the first Anglo-Sikh War [1845]. “The army would not have lost the war after winning the battle but for the absence of a supporting regime”. The Second War was triggered by the revolt of Mulraj, the governor of Multan, in 1848 which became widespread when Sikh troops joined the rebels. Final battle was fought at Chailianwali in district Gujrat which ended in the defeat for the Punjab army paving the way for the annexation of Punjab. Most of the troops in the company’s invading army were ‘Purbias’ [People from the East] from India who fought against the sovereign kingdom of Punjab. Their mercenary role in subjugating Punjab instead of embarrassing them puffed up their chest. A saying aptly describes the arrogance of the Purbias on the pay roll of the company thus: ‘Hindustani baray shitani aakar aakar chalde ne [The mischievous Hindustanis walk with an arrogant swagger]’. When people from Gangetic plains accuse Punjab of not resisting the invaders, they conveniently forget history and their treacherous role in the occupation of it during the mid-19th century. Had they stopped the colonialists in the East, they would not have overwhelmed Punjab. All this is being expressed not to antagonise any nationality but rather in the spirit of dispelling certain historical fallacies regarding Punjab’s role vis-a-vis foreign invaders. The fact of the matter is that Punjab resisted invaders from the North, South and East regardless of outcome. No invader could subjugate Punjab without first subjugating the Pathans or Sindhis or Hindustanis. — soofi01@hotmail.com [Concluded]

Back to Mushtaq Soofi's  Page

Back to Column's Page

BACK TO APNA WEB PAGE