As a foreign refuge closes in Kabul, local mosques are at risk, too
By Pamela Constable
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 9, 2010
When I read in the paper
last week that the United Nations guesthouse in Kabul would soon be
closing its doors forever, I felt a twinge of regret and nostalgia for a
time and place that would never come again, where a foreign do-gooder or
a journalist like me could find refuge from a conflicted, alien
environment in a familiar oasis of hot showers, cold beer and the
reassuring drone of a BBC newscast.
I also felt anger, because
I knew why the old lodge was closing. Kabul, a dusty but intriguing
capital where aid workers and others had survived periods of communist
rule and Taliban repression, was now a de facto war zone. Any foreign
facility was now vulnerable to bombings or commando attacks, and most
U.N. workers were confined to fortified compounds.
Then I turned the page and
read that the Data Shrine in Lahore, Pakistan, the country's most
popular gathering place for followers of a Sufi saint known as Data Ganj
Bakhsh, had been struck by suicide bombers, leaving scores of people
dead and maimed. The victims were all Pakistani Muslims, and the
religious setting seemed light-years from a Western watering hole. But
my reaction was virtually identical, and I realized after a moment that
the guesthouse and the shrine had a great deal in common.
There are virtually no public bars in Muslim countries; few places for people to let off steam, relax and unwind; and fewer where women are allowed to mingle with men. Mosques, especially of the increasingly influential Wahhabi or Deobandi strains imported to Pakistan by foreign wars and Middle Eastern clerics, can be as stern and silent as tombs. Their calls to prayer are shrill rather than inviting; their messages are exclusive, bellicose and misogynistic. Young men in their 20s, who might pour out of a sports bar flush with victory from a World Cup match, could just as easily rush out of radical prayer services looking for infidels to
attack.
For millions of Muslims,
the alternative to this militant ideology -- and the welcoming refuge
from daily cares and burdens -- is the Sufi shrine. If a Deobandi mosque
is a place of priestly order and genuflection and whispers, a Sufi
shrine is the opposite: a messy free-for-all, a place where everyone is
welcome to pray or sing or take a nap or hold a picnic; a pageant of
humanity where beggars and addicts mingle with pilgrims and penitents,
where families bring newborns in swaddling clothes and the newly dead in
coffins to be blessed.
During the past decade, I
have been to Sufi shrines all over Pakistan, and I always have felt
totally welcome and at ease. The atmosphere is heady with spiritual
ecstasy. Volunteers sit behind huge kettles, doling out free rice and
bread to endless lines of poor men, women and children. Pickpockets lurk
and exotic creatures -- transvestite dancers or shrunken-headed children
-- startle. But no one is harassed or lectured or ejected, and
everyone's shoes are carefully guarded and returned at the door.
The Sufi saints --
long-dead Persian mystics buried inside these shrines -- inspire fervent
but languid devotion. They are believed to be direct descendants of the
prophet Muhammad and to have special powers of healing and intervention.
At various shrines, I have met women praying to become pregnant, polio
victims hoping for a cure, farmers blessing a new tractor, and families
giving away sweets in gratitude because a relative, falsely accused of
murder, was released from prison. If this is superstition, so are
Catholicism, Hinduism and many other faiths.
Many Sufi saints were
famous poets in their lifetimes, and their couplets or sayings were
usually paeans to love, explorations of the soul, or wise maxims for
life with a Socratic twist that answered questions with riddles. The
most famous of all is Jalalladin Rumi, a 13th-century Persian poet,
whose search for spiritual enlightenment and a direct, passionate
relationship with God -- free from material needs or clerical oppression
-- inspired him to write thousands of essays and verses, including this
one:
God's purpose for man is to
acquire a seeing eye and an understanding heart.
Some of these saints'
current-day descendants in Pakistan, known as pirs, have become
powerful or corrupt politicians who use their religious stature for
selfish ends. But the nonviolent, mystical message of Sufism also
represents a strong challenge to the morally rigid vision of the Taliban
and other extremist Islamic groups. Today, some of Pakistan's most
successful pop groups offer music and lyrics with a Sufi theme, and the
U.S. Embassy in Islamabad is pointedly helping to refurbish some of the
older and more run-down shrines.
Extremist groups have
responded by attacking and threatening numerous shrines. The tomb of
Rahman Baba, a leafy sanctuary in Peshawar whose walls are covered with
paintings of flowers and candles, was bombed last year. A shrine near
the Swat Valley was commandeered by Taliban fighters for weeks, and many
other shrines were put under special alert after receiving threats. The
last time I visited the Data Shrine in May, police commandos guarded its
cool stone pavilions and visitors were shunted through a maze of metal
security chutes. Last week, despite such precautions, bombers killed at
least 42 worshipers and left another 150 injured.
Today life in Lahore, a
city rich in history and vibrant with activity, has been violently
disrupted and perhaps changed forever. In the past two years alone,
extremists have attacked crowded markets, police academies, cricket
teams, college campuses, moderate clerics and mosques of minority sects.
Their message is clear: The real clash of civilizations is between
moderate and radical Muslim beliefs. No place is sacred, no person is
safe and no form of governance acceptable except the most simplistic,
punitive brand of Islam.
In Kabul, we know what that
brand would look like. Taliban clerics held formal sway there from 1996
to 2001, infamously banning women from school and work, enforcing
religious rules with cruel punishments and outlawing harmless pastimes
from chess to kite flying. There was law and order for the first time in
years, but there was no joy or freedom, and foreigners were viewed with
suspicion. It was a harsh, hostile place to be an American reporter --
hot and dusty, lonely and nerve-racking. But at the end of a frustrating
day or a hard journey from the countryside, there was always a hot
shower, a lawn chair and a gin and tonic at the U.N. guesthouse, with
the BBC News theme music wafting from the bar.
Now the Taliban is back, fighting its way toward power, fiercely challenging Western troops in the south and controlling some areas within an hour's drive of the capital. There are also tens of thousands of Westerners in the country and dozens of international facilities in Kabul.
They represent a more
direct threat to the forces of fanaticism, and a more understandable
target: Westerners bring not only weapons but alcohol, women's rights,
corrupting aid dollars and foreign faiths to a conservative, insular
Muslim society, pushing it to rebel against the authority and traditions
of its elders.
Determined to drive out
these foreign influences, the Afghan Taliban has attacked foreign
symbols from embassies to hotels to military bases, as well as U.N.
facilities all over the country. Last October, militants assaulted and
blew up a small guest house for U.N. workers in the heart of Kabul,
leaving six people dead. The soon-to-be-closed U.N. guest complex had so
far escaped harm, but the last time I went there to meet a friend for a
glass of wine, I had to navigate past half a dozen roadblocks, and the
bar was almost empty. My friend, an attorney with the U.N., had to get
special security clearance and be escorted from her compound in an
armored car.
It was only a matter of time before that foreign oasis, too, fell victim to the predations of war, as it is only a matter of time before the West withdraws its forces from the region. Ultimately, the nearly 200 million people of Pakistan and Afghanistan must chart their own course and define what it means to be Muslim in the modern world. In that struggle for hearts and minds, between the tolerant pacifism of the Sufi saints and the hateful militancy of the Taliban, I surely hope dear Rumi prevails.
Constable, a fellow at the
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, is on leave from The
Post to work on a book about contemporary Pakistan. She has reported
frequently from Pakistan and Afghanistan since 1998.