New Ideological Battle in Pakistan: Traffic Circle’s  Name
              By  SALMAN MASOOD
              
            
              
            
              Diego Ibarra Sanchez for The New  York Times
              There is opposition to renaming a  busy traffic circle in Lahore, Pakistan, in honor of Bhagat Singh because he  was not Muslim.
            
            LAHORE, Pakistan — If ever a  squabble over a street name could sum up a nation’s identity crisis, it is  happening in Lahore, Pakistan’s cultural capital. 
  Enlarge This Image
  
  Diego  Ibarra Sanchez for The New York Times
              A portrait of Mr. Singh, a Sikh  revolutionary who was hanged by the British in 1931 in the spot where the  traffic circle is today.
              Late last year, a group of Lahoris  made progress in getting local officials to rename a busy  traffic circle for Bhagat Singh, a Sikh revolutionary who was hanged  at the site by the British in 1931 after a brief but eventful insurrection  against colonial rule. They see it as a chance to honor a local hero who they  feel transcends the ethnic and sectarian tensions gripping the country today —  and also as an important test of the boundaries of inclusiveness here. 
              But in the Islamic Republic of  Pakistan, questions of religious identity also become issues of patriotism, and  the effort has raised alarm bells among conservatives and Islamists. The circle  was named in 2010 for Chaudhry Rehmat Ali, a Muslim student who coined the name  Pakistan in the 1930s, and there was an outcry at the news that it might be  renamed for a non-Muslim. 
  “If a few people decide one day that  the name has to be changed, why should the voice of the majority be ignored?”  asked Zahid Butt, the head of a neighborhood business association here and a  leader of the effort to block the renaming. 
              The fight over the traffic circle —  which, when they are pressed, locals usually just call Shadman Circle, after  the surrounding neighborhood — has become a showcase battle in a wider  ideological war over nomenclature and identity here and in other Pakistani  cities. 
              Although many of Lahore’s prominent  buildings are named for non-Muslims, there has been a growing effort to  “Islamize” the city’s architecture and landmarks, critics of the trend say. In  that light, the effort to rename the circle for Mr. Singh becomes a cultural  counteroffensive. 
  “Since the ’80s, the days of the  dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, there has been an effort that everything should be  Islamized — like the Mall should be called M. A. Jinnah Road,” said Taimur  Rahman, a musician and academic from Lahore, referring to one of the city’s  central roads and to the country’s founder. “They do not want to acknowledge  that other people, from different religions, also lived here in the past.” 
              A recent nationwide surge in deadly  attacks against religious minorities, particularly against Ahmadi and Hazara  Shiites, has again put a debate over tolerance on the national agenda. Though  most Sikhs fled Pakistan soon after the partition from India in  1947, the fight over whether to honor a member of that minority publicly bears  closely on the headlines for many. 
              A push to honor Mr. Singh has been  going on here for years. But it was not until the annual remembrance of his  birth in September that things came to a head. A candlelight demonstration to  support renaming the traffic circle had an effect, and a senior district  official agreed to start the process. As part of it, he asked the public to  come forward with any objections. The complaints started pouring in. 
              Traders of Shadman Market, the local  trade group led by Mr. Butt, threatened a strike. Chillingly, warnings against  the move were issued by leaders of the Islamic aid group Jamaat-ud-Dawa,  largely believed to be a front for the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba.  Clerics voiced their opposition during Friday Prayer. 
              The issue quickly became a case for  the city’s High Court, which said it would deliberate on a petition, initiated  by Mr. Butt and a coalition of religious conservatives, to block the name  change. That was in November, and the case still awaits a hearing date. The  provincial government has remained in tiptoe mode ever since. “It is a very  delicate matter,” said Ajaz Anwar, an art historian and painter who is the vice  chairman of a civic committee that is managing the renaming process. 
              Mr. Anwar said some committee  members had proposed a compromise: renaming the circle after Habib Jalib, a  widely popular postindependence poet. That move has been rejected out of hand  by pro-Singh campaigners. 
              Mr. Rahman and other advocates for  renaming the circle paint it as a test of resistance to intolerance and  extremism, and they consider the government and much of Lahore society to have  failed it. 
  “The government’s defense in the  court has been very halfhearted,” said Yasser Latif Hamdani, a lawyer representing  the activists. “The government lawyer did not even present his case during  earlier court proceedings.” 
              The controversy threatens to become  violent. On March 23, the anniversary of Mr. Singh’s death, police officers had  to break up a heated exchange between opposing groups at the circle. 
              Mr. Rahman and the other supporters  have vowed to continue fighting, saying it has become a war over who gets to  own Pakistan’s history. 
  “There is a complete historical  amnesia and black hole regarding the independence struggle from the British,”  Mr. Rahman said, adding of the Islamists, “They want all memories to  evaporate.” 
Published:  March 30, 2013