EXCERPT: Tales Of Two Cities
Tale of two cities
Tales
of Two Cities sets out to tell that story — of independence, of
upheaval and migration and of new beginnings — through the eyes of two
observers, whose families were uprooted and who were forced to start new
lives in new states in those unpropitious circumstances.
Kuldip Nayar, one of the India’s most eminent journalists, was 24
years old in 1947 when his father had to abandon his solid medical
practice in the town of Sialkot and the family sought refuge with
relatives in Delhi. They had initially decided to remain in Pakistan
after Independence and were strengthened in their resolve by the
assurances given to the minorities by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Pakistan’s
first Governor-General. However, on Pakistan’s Independence Day,
August 14, fear gripped the Hindu community in Sialkot so suddenly that
the family got up from their lunch and left behind almost everything
they owned. After a spell with friends in the neighbouring cantonment,
they set off for Delhi, hoping to return once the situation normalised.
But it was not to be.
Asif Noorani, distinguished Pakistani journalist and critic, was only
five years old at Partition. He remembers the riots in Bombay and was
aware of some horrific incidents in his neighbourhood. But the family
weathered that storm and lived in Bombay for three more years before his
father decided to migrate to Pakistan in search of work. His father’s
business partner, the major shareholder in the medical store in which he
worked, had already left for Pakistan and when his stake was taken over
by a Hindu migrant from Sind, Asif’s father saw the writing on the
wall. This was in fact a case of economic migration, undertaken with
some reluctance, triggered by changing patterns of business ownership,
and to a greater extent a matter of choice rather than compulsion.
As Asif himself writes: ‘Even those who were not in favour of
Partition migrated to Pakistan in search of better opportunities’.
* * *
* *
The Tales of Two Cities offered by Kuldip Nayar and Asif Noorani
reflect very different Partition experiences. Kuldip’s migration from
Sialkot to Delhi across the ethnically cleansed plains of Punjab was a
very different experience from Asif Noorani’s family passage from
Bombay to Karachi in 1950 on board the S.S. Sabarmati, a regular steamer
service which continued to run until the 1965 war.
Their accounts of pre-Partition society and culture naturally reflect
their age and circumstances at the time. Coming from what he calls ‘a
secular-minded family of practising Muslims’, the young Asif Noorani
seems to have been almost unconscious of other religious communities,
assuming that Hindu school friends at his kindergarten must also be
Muslims of some sort. Kuldip Nayar, on the other hand, had already
graduated from the Law College at Lahore, had questioned Mr Jinnah in a
public meeting and had heard Maulana Azad point out the potential
pitfalls of Partition for the Muslim community. He was a politically
conscious young man and had formed a peace committee with his friends in
Sialkot to help to preserve good relations between the communities. —
David Page
From Sialkot to Delhi
I did not want to leave Sialkot city. This was my home. I was born and
brought up here. Why could not I, a Hindu, live in the Islamic state of
Pakistan when there would be hundreds of thousands of Muslims residing
in India? True, religion was the basis of Partition. But then both the
Congress and the Muslim League, the main political parties, had opposed
the exchange of population. People could stay wherever they were. Then
why on August 14, 1947 was I unwelcome at a place where my forefathers
and their forefathers had lived for decades?
Our family had other reasons to stay back. Most patients of my father, a
medical practitioner, were Muslims. My best friend, Shafquat, with whom
I had grown up, lived in Sialkot. At his mere wish I had tattooed on my
right arm, the Islamic insignia — the crescent and star. I was a
graduate in Persian. Pakistan had declared Urdu as its official
language, with which I felt at home. We had a large property and a
retinue of servants. Where would we go if we were to uproot ourselves?
Then our spiritual guardian was there. It was not a superstition but our
faith that the grave in our back garden was that of a Pir who protected
us and guided the family whenever it faced troubles. How could we leave
the Pir? The grave was our refuge. We always found relief there. Our Ma,
whenever harried or harassed or after her quarrels with our father, ran
to the grave for solace. We, three brothers and one sister, bowed before
the Pir every Thursday in reverence and lit an earthen lamp. It was our
temple. The people of Sialkot were mild, austere and tolerant. They were
cast in a different mould. Our religions or positions in life did not
distance us from one another. We numbered about a lakh: 70 per cent
Muslims and 30 per cent Hindus, Sikhs and Christians. As far as I could
remember, we had never experienced tension, much less communal riots.
Our festivals, Diwali, Holi or Eid, were jointly celebrated and most of
us walked together in mourning during Moharram. Even our businesses
depended on cooperative effort. There was a mixture of owners and
workers from both communities.
Even at the height of the agitation over the demand for Pakistan,
Sialkot did not experience any tension. Every day was like any other day
and business was as usual. The Muslim League had probably taken out two
or three processions for separation, like the ones the Congress party
had for Independence. But there was no trouble. A few pebbles thrown
into the water disturbed it for while. Otherwise, it was placid.
It was great to be alive. There was still daylight. As I looked
out, relieved and happy, I saw people walking in the opposite direction.
They were Muslims. I saw the same pain etched on their faces. They
trudged along with their belongings bundled on their heads and their
frightened children trailing behind. They too had left behind their home
and hearth, friends and hopes. They too had been broken on the wrack of
history. A caravan from our side was going to Pakistan. We stopped to
make way for them. They too stopped. But no one spoke. We looked at one
another with sympathy, not fear. A strange understanding cropped up
between us. It was a spontaneous kinship, of hurt, loss and
helplessness. Both were refugees.
There was a burst of happiness when Pakistan came into being. The
Muslim population was on top of the world. The Sikhs were depressed. But
most people took the whole thing in their stride. The atmosphere
deteriorated only when Muslims ousted from India began pouring in and
when it dawned on the Muslim population that they had an independent
country of their own.
Yet there was no tension, not even a twinge of enmity. We spoke the same
Punjabi. The Punjabi we spoke in Sialkot had a peculiar accent. I
discovered this when I met Nawaz Sharif, then chief minister, for the
first time at Delhi in the 1990s. It took him no time to tell me that I
was from Sialkot. He said that the way in which I spoke Punjabi had a
distinctive twang, a kind of accent, which was confined to the
Sialkotees. I was in good company: the Subcontinent’s two great Urdu
poets, Mohammed Iqbal and Faiz Ahmed Faiz, who were from Sialkot, spoke
Punjabi in the same way. I had heard Iqbal one day at his mohalla,
Imambara, where Shafquat had taken me. I was a child then and I never
went near him out of fear. Even otherwise I would not have approached
him at that time because he was speaking angrily in Punjabi. All that I
remembered about him was his huge girth, sitting on a charpai (or string
bed), which almost touched the ground because of his weight.
* * *
* *
WE had killed one million of one another and uprooted 20 million.
Temples, mosques and gurdwaras had been demolished in hundreds. The
Subcontinent’s composite culture and pluralistic society going back
hundreds of years lay in tatters.
It was late in the afternoon when the jeep reached the outskirts of
Lahore. It halted there. We were told that a caravan of Muslims had been
attacked at Amritsar and that the Muslims in Lahore were waiting on the
roadside to take revenge. We got down and waited in fear and silence.
There was some stray shooting in the distance. The stench of decomposed
flesh from nearby fields hung in the air. We could hear people shouting
slogans: Allah Ho Akbar, Ya Ali and Pakistan Zindabad. But it was far
away. We set off again.
There was nervousness as we approached the border. And then we heard
Bharat Mata Ki Jai. We drove past the hurriedly erected whitewashed
drums and the Indian flag on a bamboo pole that marked the border. There
was rejoicing and people on the Indian side hugged one another.
It was great to be alive. There was still daylight. As I looked out,
relieved and happy, I saw people walking in the opposite direction. They
were Muslims. I saw the same pain etched on their faces. They trudged
along with their belongings bundled on their heads and their frightened
children trailing behind. They too had left behind their home and
hearth, friends and hopes. They too had been broken on the wrack of
history. A caravan from our side was going to Pakistan. We stopped to
make way for them. They too stopped. But no one spoke. We looked at one
another with sympathy, not fear. A strange understanding cropped up
between us. It was a spontaneous kinship, of hurt, loss and
helplessness. Both were refugees.
The railway platform at Amritsar was so crowded that it was difficult to
move without requesting someone to make way. People obliged quickly. Had
the tragedy made them humane or had it taught them humility? It was so
noisy that I had to shout at the top of my voice to make myself heard.
I did not know where they — hundreds of them — were going. Every
train which arrived would be full in no time. I waited for the Frontier
Mail to go to Delhi. I had to use all my force to get in. Squeezing in
the bag required even greater strength.
I was taken for a Muslim in the 2nd Class compartment in which I rode.
Non-Sikh Punjabis on both sides looked alike. They dressed in the same
way. They ate the same food and even behaved in the same way. Everyone
was condemning their leaders for letting them down. But I was abusing
them at the top of my voice. I got attention, no doubt, but also some
hostile looks.
My bare right arm flashed the crescent and star which I had got tattooed
at Sialkot. I heard whispers of suspicion about my identity. Was he a
Muslim abusing loudly to cover up his religion? The tattoo heightened
the suspicion and convinced more and more people in the compartment that
I was Muslim.
I was pulled out at Ludhiana, coincidentally the city where most people
from Sialkot had migrated. Burly Sikhs with spears and swords joined a
hostile crowd around me at the platform. I was asked to prove that I was
a Hindu. I could see blood in their eyes. Before I could pull my pants
down, a halwai (sweet-meat seller) from Sialkot, from our locality
itself, came to my rescue. He shouted that I was Doctor Sahib’s son.
Another joined him to confirm and the unbelieving people dispersed. This
ended my agony as well as the excitement of the spectators. I was let
off. But those few minutes still haunt me. There was no mercy those
days. — Kuldip Nayar
From Bombay to Karachi
For someone born in 1942, Independence and Partition remain a somewhat
hazy memory. However, I distinctly remember being taken by my father to
see the illuminations on some buildings. We enjoyed the view from the
upper storey of a double-decker bus in Bombay. That was perhaps on the
eve of independence. I also recall the parade of the armed forces, a
year later. The smartly turned out soldiers passed through Pydhonie, not
too far from where we lived.
My pre-Independence memory is restricted to raising the then popular
slogan ‘Up, up the national flag; down, down the Union Jack’ with
other boys, after school hours, for many days. The only Jack I knew in
those days was the one who went up the hill with Jill for that was my
favourite nursery rhyme. I am sure most of the slogan-raisers from the
missionary school, St Joseph’s High School at Umerkhadi in Bombay
were, like me, unaware of the meaning of the slogan and even the
significance of Independence. When someone asked me why I was chanting
the slogan, I said because all my friends were doing it. I was at that
time in what they called the Infant Class, the junior-most in the
school.
I had earlier been to a kindergarten school called Dawoodbhoy Fazalbhoy
School, which was run by the Ismailis (followers of the Aga Khan). It
was a good enough school but I didn’t like it for two reasons. For one
thing, they served only vegetarian food at lunch time and, for another,
all the kids were made to take an afternoon nap. I was too restless to
sleep at what were odd hours to me. I simply couldn’t close my eyes
and was often punished for not letting my ‘neighbours’ — the kids
lying beside me — go to sleep either. Eventually, a mattress was laid
down for me in one corner of the room so that I could not disturb my
classmates. My monthly reports said ‘good’ in all subjects and
‘very good’ in English but ‘bad’ in the column for conduct.
Though the school was in a predominantly Muslim locality, children from
Hindu families were in significant numbers too. But when the communal
riots began, some Hindu children moved to schools in what their parents
thought were ‘safer’ environs.
St Joseph’s School, where my parents had both studied, was in what was
considered a Hindu muhalla, but it had never seen any riots, at least
not while we were in Bombay — until September 1950. Communal
disturbances in those days were mostly confined to such areas as Dadar,
Parel, Kalbadevi, Gol Pitha, Madanpura and Bhindi Bazaar.
My best friend in those days at St Joseph’s was a boy called Subhash
Thorat. All I remember of him, apart from his name, is his crew cut and
a question that I asked him: ‘Are you a Shia or a Sunni?’ He
replied: ‘I don’t know. I’ll ask my father.’ I somehow thought
that Hindus could be Shias or Sunnis too. I wasn’t sure who I was. I
still wonder how the classification of the two main Islamic sects
entered my mind, for ours was a secular-minded family of practising
Muslims. Sects, castes and communal differences didn’t matter to my
elders, which is something I inherited from them.
The same question was asked four or five years later in Lahore after we
migrated to Pakistan but this time I was at the receiving end. A girl
from my class, with whom I shared my sweets, posed the same question.
‘I guess I am a Sunni,’ I said. ‘Well, then I am a Shia. Remember!
I can’t marry a Sunni boy,’ she responded with a grim face. I
wasn’t particularly interested in marrying her, at least not at the
age of ten, but I did lament the loss of an option.
* * *
* *
One
incident, which is deeply etched on my memory, is the news of the
assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. My parents were particularly worried
about the safety of my uncle, Malik Noorani, and his wife, Mumtaz
Noorani, both hardened leftists, who had gone to Delhi to attend the
wedding of poet Ali Sardar Jafri and Sultana at that time. Everyone
feared that the assassin was a Muslim, so the marriage party was
disrupted and all those present, including the newlyweds, fearing the
outbreak of a communal riot, rushed to safer places. When it was
confirmed that the assassin was a Hindu, policemen in trucks announced
on their megaphones: ‘Gandhiji ka qatal kisi Musulman ne naheen balke
eik Hindu ne kiya hai.’ (Gandhiji was not assassinated by a Muslim,
but by a Hindu). Thus, what could have led to as bloody a riot as the
anti-Sikh riot in Delhi in 1984, after the two Sikh bodyguards of Indira
Gandhi opened fire at her, was averted by the presence of mind shown by
the authorities.
I remember clearly that one morning my father, who used to go out every
day to pick up freshly baked bread and the day’s copy of The Times of
India, entered the house with a sullen face. He announced the death of
Quaid-e-Azam, Muhammed Ali Jinnah. My knowledge of Mr Jinnah was
confined to the slogans which some people in the neighbourhood used to
raise: ’Quaid-e-Azam zindabad, Pakistan paindabad’. But after
Partition the slogans died down — discretion being the better part of
valour.
* * *
* *
When I compare Mumbai and Karachi, I sometimes feel they are twins
that were separated at birth. The white collar workers and the labour
class in both countries make a beeline for these two great cities.
It’s a Gold Rush kind of a situation. The weather in both the cities
is moderate, except that Karachi doesn’t get even half as much rain as
Mumbai, and both suffer from increasing congestion and pressure on
services. Every time I go to Mumbai I find it more claustrophobic. The
traffic, though more disciplined than in Karachi, drives me crazy
particularly during the rush hour. When I visited the city in 2007, it
took me an hour and a half to reach South Mumbai from the airport with
the result that I could not visit friends and relatives living in places
like Bandra and Juhu, not to speak of more far flung suburbs during my
short stay.
Mumbai scores a major point over Karachi in its control of crime. There
are occasional gunfights between Mafia groups in Mumbai but otherwise it
is city free from major crimes. Robberies are much less in number and
cars are not snatched at gunpoint. The one plus-point that Karachi has
is that you don’t find people walking without shoes, nor do you see
people sleeping on pavements. People sleeping on pavements in Mumbai are
a sore sight.
Karachi and Mumbai have both been plagued by bomb blasts, but megacities
as they are, the unaffected areas continue to function more or less
normally. Besides, they are both highly resilient. All said and done,
there is no city in the world I love to visit more than Mumbai but if I
am asked to choose between Mumbai and Karachi my vote will go to
Karachi. In fact, after more than fifty years as a resident, I have come
to feel about Karachi in much the same way as Milton wrote about England
— ‘With all thy faults, I love thee still.’— Asif Noorani
Excerpted with permission from
Tales of Two Cities
By Kuldip Nayar and Asif Noorani
Roli Books, New Delhi Available at
Liberty Books, Karachi
126pp. Rs545
BACK TO APNA WEB PAGE