|   BHAGAT Singh, ever the guerrilla  fighter, keeps cropping up at places, as if trying to ambush the prigs who  today inhabit the area he took by storm almost nine decades ago. Until  recently, some patriots were successfully stalling an attempt to name a square  in Lahore after him. But it seems that the attempt to deny history and deny its  heroes their due has not been able to sufficiently dampen the spirits of those  incorrigible souls looking to set the perspective right. A lawyer in Lahore has  sought a reopening of the 1928 John Saunders’ case that led to the execution of  Bhagat Singh and his comrades. The lawyer last week achieved what has been  called by some as a mini victory. After some nudging, the police have provided  him with a copy of the FIR of the case, which does not identify those who had  attacked the British police officer. This could just mean the complainants did  not know who the assailants were at the time the FIR was lodged, and that the  names of the suspects might have been added later. This was not, nor is, an  unusual practice, but the production of the FIR here is significant: the Lahore  High Court had deemed its availability necessary for considering a reopening of  the Bhagat Singh case.                   
                                  The trials and mistrials of the  freedom fighters are the latter’s medals, a proof of their gallantry and of the  oppressive colonial treatment they were subjected to. From that angle, it is  difficult to see what additional honours a retrial could confer on these  heroes. But a reinvestigation would expose the facts and satisfy the urge to  recreate a picture as close to reality as possible. It will help to better  understand the system as it worked then, and maybe offer comparisons with the  practices of today. To that end — the enriching of historical accounts with  factual detail — it is worthwhile to revisit the case of Bhagat Singh and other  persecuted freedom fighters. From :  DAWN  May  06, 2014
   |